November 04, 2025

Get In Touch

Uninterrupted Oral Anticoagulant Therapy Beneficial In Patients Undergoing PCI: JACC

In a recent research report, it has been highlighted that Interrupted Oral Anticoagulant ( I-OAC) and Uninterrupted Oral Anticoagulant Therapy (U-OAC) have equivalent risk for major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events and bleeding complications. Rather, it was noted that an U-OAC strategy was associated with shorter length of hospitalization. These data further support U-OAC as the preferable strategy in patients on OAC undergoing coronary intervention. Findings have been published in Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
There is a paucity of data regarding the optimal peri-procedural management of OAC-treated patients. So, this recent study sought to compare interrupted and uninterrupted oral anticoagulant therapy (I-OAC vs. U-OAC) in patients on OAC undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.
For the study design,in the SWEDEHEART registry, all patients on OAC who were admitted acutely and underwent percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary angiography with a diagnostic procedure, from 2005 to 2017, were included. Outcomes were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE; death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) and bleeds at 120 days. Propensity score was used to adjust for the nonrandomized treatment selection.
Data analysis revealed some new facts.
The study included 6,485 patients: 3,322 in the I-OAC group and 3,163 in the U-OAC group. The cumulative incidence of MACCE was 8.2% (269 events) versus 8.2% (254 events) in the I-OAC and the U-OAC groups, respectively.
The adjusted risk for MACCE did not differ between the groups (I-OAC vs. U-OAC hazard ratio: 0.89; 95% confidence interval: 0.71 to 1.12).
Similarly, no difference was found in the risk for MACCE or bleeds (12.6% vs. 12.9%, adjusted hazard ratio: 0.87; 95% confidence interval: 0.70 to 1.07). The risk for major or minor in-hospital bleeds did not differ between the groups.
However, U-OAC was associated with a significantly shorter duration of hospitalization: 4 (3 to 7) days versus 5 (3 to 8) days; p < 0.01.
For full article follow the link:Uninterrupted Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Patients Undergoing Unplanned Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2021 Apr 12;14(7)754-763, D Venetsanos, M Skibniewski, M Janzon, SS Lawesson, E Charitakis, F Böhm, L Henareh, P Andell, LO Karlson, M Simonsson, S Völz, D Erlinge, E Omerovic, J Alfredsson
Primary source: Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Disclaimer: This website is designed for healthcare professionals and serves solely for informational purposes.
The content provided should not be interpreted as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, prescriptions, or endorsements of specific medical practices. It is not a replacement for professional medical consultation or the expertise of a licensed healthcare provider.
Given the ever-evolving nature of medical science, we strive to keep our information accurate and up to date. However, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the content.
If you come across any inconsistencies, please reach out to us at admin@doctornewsdaily.com.
We do not support or endorse medical opinions, treatments, or recommendations that contradict the advice of qualified healthcare professionals.
By using this website, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy.
For further details, please review our Full Disclaimer.

0 Comments

Post a comment

Please login to post a comment.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!