Intracranial aneurysms have become relatively common in the past few decade, with a prevalence of approximately 4%. Unruptured aneurysms may cause symptoms mainly due to a mass effect, but the real danger is when an aneurysm ruptures, leading to a subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Ruptured intracranial aneurysms (IAs) are the leading cause for atraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage. A recent study in Academic Radiology provides an evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of Ultra-High-Resolution Computed Tomography Angiography (UHR-CTA) and Normal-Resolution Computed Tomography Angiography (NR-CTA) concerning IA detection and characterization.

Researchers compared both UHR-CTA and NR-CTA techniques and found that UHR-CTA was a much superior technique compared to NR-CTA in diagnosis, the method also provided improved image quality and reducing patient radiation exposure.
The study included consecutive patients with atraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage who received Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) and either UHR-CTA or NR-CTA were retrospectively included. Three readers evaluated CT-Angiography regarding image quality, diagnostic confidence and presence of IAs. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated on patient-level and segment-level with reference standard DSA-imaging. CTA patient radiation exposure (effective dose) was compared.
The key findings of the study are
• One hundred and eight patients were identified (mean age = 57.8 ± 14.1 years, 65 women). UHR-CTA revealed significantly higher image quality and diagnostic confidence (P < 0.001) for all readers and significantly lower effective dose (P < 0.001).
• Readers correctly classified ≥55/56 patients on UHR-CTA and ≥44/52 patients on NR-CTA. We noted significantly higher patient-level sensitivity for UHR-CTA compared to NR-CTA for all three readers (reader 1: 41/41 [100%] vs. 28/34 [82%], reader 2: 41/41 [100%] vs. 30/34 [88%], reader 3: 41/41 [100%] vs. 30/34 [88%], P ≤ 0.04).
• Segment-level analysis also revealed significantly higher sensitivity for UHR-CTA compared to NR-CTA for all three readers (reader 1: 47/49 [96%] vs. 34/45 [76%], reader 2: 47/49 [96%] vs. 37/45 [82%], reader 3: 48/49 [98%] vs. 37/45 [82%], P ≤ 0.04). Specificity was comparable for both techniques.
Researchers concluded that “We found Ultra-High-Resolution CT-Angiography to provide higher sensitivity than Normal-Resolution CT-Angiography for the detection of intracranial aneurysms in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage while improving image quality and reducing patient radiation exposure.”
Reference: Marius Frenzel, Felix A. Ucar, Carolin Brockmann, Prof MD et al; Comparison of Ultra-High-Resolution and Normal-Resolution CT-Angiography for Intracranial Aneurysm Detection in Patients with Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; October 09, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2023.08.035