Tricyclic Antidepressants Effective For Treatment Of Irritable Bowel Syndrome
- byDoctor News Daily Team
- 22 July, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 0 Mins
"Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) hampers ones quality of life of a similar magnitude to individuals with other chronic gastrointestinal conditions, such as Crohn's disease, and worse quality of life than patients with other chronic non-gastrointestinal diseases, such as diabetes or heart failure."
Usually IBS are managed in primary care but at times, first-line therapies for IBS are ineffective, the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline suggests considering low- dose tricyclic antidepressants as second-line treatment, but their effectiveness in primary care is unknown, and they are infrequently prescribed in this setting.
The largest trial of a tricyclic antidepressant in IBS ever conducted according to researchers reveals that the titrated low-dose amitriptyline was superior to placebo as a second-line treatment for IBS in primary care across multiple outcomes, and was safe and well tolerated. Researchers emphasize on the fact that general practitioners should offer low-dose amitriptyline to patients with IBS whose symptoms for those who did not improve with first-line therapies. The findings are published in The Lancet.
The randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (Amitriptyline at Low-Dose and Titrated for Irritable Bowel Syndrome as Second-Line Treatment [ATLANTIS]) was conducted at 55 general practices in England. Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older, with Rome IV IBS of any subtype, and ongoing symptoms (IBS Severity Scoring System [IBS-SSS] score ≥75 points) despite dietary changes and first-line therapies, a normal full blood count and C-reactive protein, negative coeliac serology, and no evidence of suicidal ideation.
Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to low-dose oral amitriptyline (10 mg once daily) or placebo for 6 months, with dose titration over 3 weeks (up to 30 mg once daily), according to symptoms and tolerability. Participants, their general practitioners, investigators, and the analysis team were all masked to allocation throughout the trial. The primary outcome was the IBS-SSS score at 6 months. Effectiveness analyses were according to intention-to-treat; safety analyses were on all participants who took at least one dose of the trial medication.
The key findings of the study are
• A total of 463 participants (mean age 48•5 years [SD 16•1], 315 [68%] female to 148 [32%] male) between Oct 18, 2019, and April 11, 2022, were 232 randomly allocated to receive low-dose amitriptyline or 231 to placebo.
• Intention-to-treat analysis of the primary outcome showed a significant difference in favour of low-dose amitriptyline in IBS-SSS score between groups at 6 months (–27•0, 95% CI –46•9 to –7•10; p=0•0079).
• 46 (20%) participants discontinued low-dose amitriptyline (30 [13%] due to adverse events), and 59 (26%) discontinued placebo (20 [9%] due to adverse events) before 6 months.
• There were five serious adverse reactions (two in the amitriptyline group and three in the placebo group), and five serious adverse events unrelated to trial medication.
Researchers concluded that “To our knowledge, this is the largest trial of a tricyclic antidepressant in IBS ever conducted. Titrated low-dose amitriptyline was superior to placebo as a second-line treatment for IBS in primary care across multiple outcomes, and was safe and well tolerated. General practitioners should offer low-dose amitriptyline to patients with IBS whose symptoms do not improve with first-line therapies, with appropriate support to guide patient-led dose titration, such as the self-titration document developed for this trial.”
Reference: Ford AC, Wright-Hughes A, Alderson SL, et al. Amitriptyline at Low-Dose and Titrated for Irritable Bowel Syndrome as Second-Line Treatment in primary care (ATLANTIS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01523-4.
Disclaimer: This website is designed for healthcare professionals and serves solely for informational purposes.
The content provided should not be interpreted as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, prescriptions, or endorsements of specific medical practices. It is not a replacement for professional medical consultation or the expertise of a licensed healthcare provider.
Given the ever-evolving nature of medical science, we strive to keep our information accurate and up to date. However, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the content.
If you come across any inconsistencies, please reach out to us at
admin@doctornewsdaily.com.
We do not support or endorse medical opinions, treatments, or recommendations that contradict the advice of qualified healthcare professionals.
By using this website, you agree to our
Terms of Use,
Privacy Policy, and
Advertisement Policy.
For further details, please review our
Full Disclaimer.
Recent News
Silent Heart Attacks Pose Long-Term Health Risks f...
- 06 November, 2025
Long-Term Melatonin Use Associated to Increased He...
- 06 November, 2025
Can Whole-Fat Dairy Reduce Risk of Heart Disease?
- 06 November, 2025
Daily Newsletter
Get all the top stories from Blogs to keep track.
0 Comments
Post a comment
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!