November 04, 2025

Get In Touch

Prehospital Pain Management: Evidence-Based Guideline

USA: A recent guideline published in the journal Prehospital Emergency Care contains evidence-based guidelines for the administration of analgesics for moderate to severe pain by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) clinicians. The guideline was based on a separate, previously published, a systematic review of the comparative effectiveness of analgesics in the prehospital setting prepared by the University of Connecticut Evidence-Based Practice Center for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ).
For developing it, a technical expert panel (TEP) was assembled consisting of subject matter experts in the development of evidence-based guidelines patient care guideline, and prehospital and emergency care. Based on the Key Questions identified in the AHRQ systematic review, a series of nine "patient/population-intervention-comparison-outcome" (PICO) questions were developed, and an additional PICO question was developed to specifically address analgesia in pediatric patients.
Given below are the key recommendations:
The authors recommend in favor of intranasal (IN) fentanyl over intramuscular (IM) or intravenous (IV) opioids in the treatment of moderate to severe pain in pediatric patients prior to IV access or without (or without indication for) IV access (strong recommendation, low certainty of evidence). The panel makes a conditional recommendation for either IN fentanyl or IV opioids once IV access is established.
The authors suggest in favor of IV acetaminophen (APAP) over IV opioids alone for the initial management of moderate to severe pain in the prehospital setting if IV APAP is available, affordable, and easy to administer.
The authors suggest either IV NSAIDS or IV opioids for the initial management of moderate to severe pain in the prehospital setting.
The authors suggest in favor of IV NSAIDs over IV APAP for the initial management of moderate to severe pain in the prehospital setting. Additionally, we recommend in favor of either PO NSAIDs or PO APAP for the initial management of pain in the prehospital setting if an oral analgesic is considered.
The authors suggest either IV ketamine or IV NSAIDs for the initial management of moderate to severe pain in the prehospital setting.
The authors suggest either IV ketamine or IV opioids for the initial management of moderate to severe pain in the prehospital setting.
If opioids are selected for pain management, the authors suggest either IV morphine or IV fentanyl for the treatment of moderate to severe pain in the prehospital setting.
The authors suggest against the combination of weight-based IV opioid plus weight-based IV ketamine versus weight-based IV opioid alone for the initial management of moderate to severe pain in the prehospital setting.
No recommendation was made at this time on the comparison between the combination of an IV opioid plus IV ketamine, versus IV ketamine alone for the initial management of moderate to severe pain in the prehospital setting due to significant uncertainty of the evidence and incomplete information concerning the comparison.
No recommendation was made regarding the comparison between nitrous oxide versus IV opioids for the initial management of moderate to severe pain in the prehospital setting.
To conclude, the recommendations emphasize that EMS medical directors and EMS clinicians have a variety of effective options for the management of moderate to severe pain in addition to opioids when designing patient care guidelines and caring for patients suffering from acute pain.
Reference:
Jonathan R. Powell, Lorin R. Browne, Kyle Guild, Manish I. Shah, Remle P. Crowe, George Lindbeck, Sabina Braithwaite, Eddy S. Lang, Ashish R. Panchal, On behalf of the Technical Expert Panel. (2022) Evidence-Based Guidelines for Prehospital Pain Management: Literature and Methods. Prehospital Emergency Care 0:0, pages 1-8.

Disclaimer: This website is designed for healthcare professionals and serves solely for informational purposes.
The content provided should not be interpreted as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, prescriptions, or endorsements of specific medical practices. It is not a replacement for professional medical consultation or the expertise of a licensed healthcare provider.
Given the ever-evolving nature of medical science, we strive to keep our information accurate and up to date. However, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the content.
If you come across any inconsistencies, please reach out to us at admin@doctornewsdaily.com.
We do not support or endorse medical opinions, treatments, or recommendations that contradict the advice of qualified healthcare professionals.
By using this website, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy.
For further details, please review our Full Disclaimer.

0 Comments

Post a comment

Please login to post a comment.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!