Patient Dies After Flash Pulmonary Oedema: Private Hospital, Doctor Directed To Pay Rs 12 Lakh Compensation
- byDoctor News Daily Team
- 02 July, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 0 Mins
Mohali: Observing negligence on part of a private hospital in Amritsar and a doctor that resulted in the death of a patient, the Punjab Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission has increased the amount of compensation from Rs 3 lakh to Rs 12 lakh to be paid by the facility and the medical practitioner to the kin of the patient who went into flash pulmonary oedema.
The case concerned a patient who was suffering from severe chest pain and was rushed to the hospital on July 12, 2016. As per Advocate Updip Singh representing the complainant (the patient's son), one of the doctors received the patient and an ECG was conducted. The ECG report was sent to the respondent doctor on his cell phone who advised treatment for the patient.
Accordingly, the hospital followed the treatment suggested by the doctor, however, the complainant alleged that there was no competent cardiologist present at that point of time when the patient had a sudden onset of breathlessness and he went into flash pulmonary oedema and subsequently passed away.
Also Read:WB: Regulatory Commission cracks whip on 3 hospitals over allegations of billing irregularities, medical negligence
Aggrieved, the complainant first approached the District Consumer Forum and the forum held the hospital and the doctor guilty of negligence and awarded compensation to the petitioner.
Opposing the verdict of the district forum, the doctor and the hospital approached the Punjab State Commission, Punjab but the commission disposed of their appeal.
Moreover, allowing the appeal of the complainant partially, the commission increased the compensation amount from Rs 3 lakhs as decided by the district commission to 12 lakhs and directed the hospital and the doctor to jointly pay a compensation of Rs 12 lakhs to the complainant.
The President of the commission, Justice Paramjeet Singh Dhaliwal further clarified that the amount charged by the district forum as expenses for treatment and the cost of litigation will remain the same, reports The Tribune.
Disclaimer: This website is designed for healthcare professionals and serves solely for informational purposes.
The content provided should not be interpreted as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, prescriptions, or endorsements of specific medical practices. It is not a replacement for professional medical consultation or the expertise of a licensed healthcare provider.
Given the ever-evolving nature of medical science, we strive to keep our information accurate and up to date. However, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the content.
If you come across any inconsistencies, please reach out to us at
admin@doctornewsdaily.com.
We do not support or endorse medical opinions, treatments, or recommendations that contradict the advice of qualified healthcare professionals.
By using this website, you agree to our
Terms of Use,
Privacy Policy, and
Advertisement Policy.
For further details, please review our
Full Disclaimer.
Recent News
Pfizer files lawsuit against Metsera, its Director...
- 02 November, 2025
Health Ministry achieves 3 Guinness World Records...
- 02 November, 2025
Roche gets CE mark for Elecsys Dengue Ag test to d...
- 02 November, 2025
Daily Newsletter
Get all the top stories from Blogs to keep track.
0 Comments
Post a comment
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!