Impact of Surgical Techniques on Dry Eye Syndrome in Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty

A recent double-blind, randomized clinical trial investigated the impact of different surgical techniques on Dry Eye Syndrome (DES) in patients undergoing bilateral upper eyelid blepharoplasty (ULB). The findings were published in the journal of Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

The study was conducted from 2017 to 2019 and compared orbicularis-sparing versus orbicularis-excising methods to assess both subjective and objective DES metrics.

Aesthetic procedures like the upper eyelid blepharoplasty (ULB) are common interventions for various functional and cosmetic reasons. Concerns of Dry Eye Syndrome (DES) post-surgery have prompted this rigorous investigation into the comparative effects of two different surgical techniques.

This double-blind, randomized trial included a total of 63 patients who underwent routine functional ULB. The patients were divided into a group receiving the orbicularis-sparing technique and the other receiving the orbicularis-excising technique. A set of subjective and objective DES assessments were conducted preoperatively and at 1 month and 1 year postoperatively.

Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) scores demonstrated a decrease in both groups at both postoperative intervals. This improvement was consistent across the surgical techniques employed. The objective DES assessments, which consisted of seven metrics, did not significantly change postoperatively for any group.

The study revealed an association between the severity of preoperative DES symptoms and the degree of subjective improvement postoperatively. This suggests that patients with more pronounced symptoms pre-surgery experienced a more significant subjective relief after the procedure regardless of the surgical technique employed.

The findings suggest that neither the orbicularis-sparing nor the orbicularis-excising technique for ULB worsens subjective or objective DES metrics. This provides the surgeons and patients with reassurance to employ these approaches confidently without exacerbating dry eye symptoms.

Source

Mian, O. T., Lippe, C. M., Khan, A., Bugg, V. A., Bryant, J. C., Riaz, K. M., Dvorak, J. D., Ding, K., & Moreau, A. (2023). Dry eye in the upper blepharoplasty patient: a study comparing orbicularis-sparing versus orbicularis-excising techniques. In Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology (Vol. 261, Issue 12, pp. 3625–3634). Springer Science and Business Media LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-023-06131-