November 07, 2025

Get In Touch

Microdoses Of Incisional Antibiotics Effectively Reduce Surgical Site Infections In Skin Cancer Surgery

Microdoses of Incisional Antibiotics in Skin Cancer Surgery

Microdoses of Incisional Antibiotics Effective in Reducing Rate of Surgical Site Infections in Skin Cancer Surgery

A new study published in the JAMA Surgery suggests that microdoses of incisional antibiotics are effective in reducing the rate of surgical site infections (SSIs) in skin cancer surgery.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) represent a costly and preventable complication of cutaneous surgery. However, there is a paucity of randomized clinical trials investigating antibiotic prophylaxis for reducing SSIs in skin cancer surgery, and evidence-based guidelines are lacking. Incisional antibiotics have been shown to reduce the rate of SSIs before Mohs micrographic surgery, but this represents a small subset of skin cancer surgery.

A study was done to determine whether microdosed incisional antibiotics reduce the rate of SSIs before skin cancer surgery.

Study Design

In this double-blind, controlled, parallel-design randomized clinical trial, adult patients presenting to a high-volume skin cancer treatment center in Auckland, New Zealand, for any form of skin cancer surgery over 6 months from February to July 2019 were included. Patient presentations were randomized to one of 3 treatment arms. Data were analyzed from October 2021 to February 2022.

Patients received an incision site injection of:

  • Buffered local anesthetic alone (control)
  • Buffered local anesthetic with microdosed flucloxacillin (500 µg/mL)
  • Buffered local anesthetic with microdosed clindamycin (500 µg/mL)

The primary end point was the rate of postoperative SSI (calculated as number of lesions with SSI per total number of lesions in the group), defined as a standardized postoperative wound infection score of 5 or more.

Results

A total of 681 patients (721 total presentations; 1133 total lesions) returned for postoperative assessments and were analyzed. Of these, 413 (60.6%) were male, and the mean (SD) age was 70.4 (14.8) years. Based on treatment received, the proportion of lesions exhibiting a postoperative wound infection score of 5 or greater was:

  • 5.7% (22 of 388) in the control arm
  • 5.3% (17 of 323) in the flucloxacillin arm
  • 2.1% (9 of 422) in the clindamycin arm (P = .01 for clindamycin vs control)

Findings were similar after adjusting for baseline differences among arms. Compared with lesions in the control arm (31 of 388 [8.0%]), significantly fewer lesions in the clindamycin arm (9 of 422 [2.1%]; P < .001) and flucloxacillin (13 of 323 [4.0%]; P = .03) arms required postoperative systemic antibiotics.

This study evaluated the use of incisional antibiotics for SSI prophylaxis in general skin cancer surgery and compared the efficacy of flucloxacillin vs clindamycin relative to control in cutaneous surgery. The significant reduction in SSI with locally applied microdosed incisional clindamycin provides robust evidence to inform treatment guidelines in this area, which are currently lacking.

Reference

Goh M, Hollewand C, McBride S, Ryan N, van der Werf B, Mathy JA. Effect of Microdoses of Incisional Antibiotics on the Rate of Surgical Site Infections in Skin Cancer Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. Published online May 24, 2023. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2023.1201

Disclaimer: This website is designed for healthcare professionals and serves solely for informational purposes.
The content provided should not be interpreted as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, prescriptions, or endorsements of specific medical practices. It is not a replacement for professional medical consultation or the expertise of a licensed healthcare provider.
Given the ever-evolving nature of medical science, we strive to keep our information accurate and up to date. However, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the content.
If you come across any inconsistencies, please reach out to us at admin@doctornewsdaily.com.
We do not support or endorse medical opinions, treatments, or recommendations that contradict the advice of qualified healthcare professionals.
By using this website, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy.
For further details, please review our Full Disclaimer.

0 Comments

Post a comment

Please login to post a comment.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!