November 05, 2025

Get In Touch

Laparoscopic Robotic Pyeloplasty Safe And Has Similar Success Rates As Open Surgery In Infants

A recent study analyzed the outcomes of minimally invasive pyeloplasty (MIP) in treating ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO), the leading cause of congenital hydronephrosis in infants. UPJO, a condition where there is a blockage where the ureter meets the kidney, has conventionally been treated with open surgery, but the study published in the Journal of Pediatric Urology suggests that MIP could be a safer alternative.
This systematic review of 13 selected studies comprising 3,494 patients, aimed to determine whether the benefits observed in MIP for adults and children over 2 years of age extended to infants aged 1 to 23 months.
The key findings of the study were:
Infants who underwent MIP experienced, on average, 1.16 fewer hospital days compared to those who had open surgery.
The analysis revealed that the MIP group had a slightly longer operative time (137.63 minutes) compared to the open surgery group (119.92 minutes). However, this was outweighed by the significant reduction in hospital stay, making MIP an attractive option for parents and caregivers.
The study finds that laparoscopic/robotic pyeloplasty is a safe technique for infants, with success rates comparable to open surgery. However, the researchers emphasize the need for further research, particularly randomized clinical trials with extended follow-up periods, to solidify these findings with robust scientific evidence.
This breakthrough in infant surgery could revolutionize the way UPJO is treated in the youngest patients. The potential for a minimally invasive approach not just reduce hospital stay but also suggest a shift towards safer and less invasive procedures for delicate infant populations.
Further validation through extended studies are required, while this research opens the door to a new era of surgical interventions for congenital kidney conditions, offering hope for both parents and healthcare providers dealing with this common and challenging issue in infants.
Reference:
Ortiz-Seller, D., Panach-Navarrete, J., Valls-González, L., & Martínez-Jabaloyas, J. M. (2023). Comparison between open and minimally invasive pyeloplasty in infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. In Journal of Pediatric Urology. Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.11.017

Disclaimer: This website is designed for healthcare professionals and serves solely for informational purposes.
The content provided should not be interpreted as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, prescriptions, or endorsements of specific medical practices. It is not a replacement for professional medical consultation or the expertise of a licensed healthcare provider.
Given the ever-evolving nature of medical science, we strive to keep our information accurate and up to date. However, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the content.
If you come across any inconsistencies, please reach out to us at admin@doctornewsdaily.com.
We do not support or endorse medical opinions, treatments, or recommendations that contradict the advice of qualified healthcare professionals.
By using this website, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy.
For further details, please review our Full Disclaimer.

0 Comments

Post a comment

Please login to post a comment.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!