Immediate Or Postponed Drainage Has Similar Outcomes In Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis: NEJM
- byDoctor News Daily Team
- 02 August, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 0 Mins
No superiority was noted between immediate versus postponed intervention for infected necrotizing pancreatitis (NP), according to a study published in The New England Journal of Medicine.
Infected necrotizing pancreatitis is a potentially lethal disease that is treated with the use of a step-up approach, with catheter drainage often delayed until the infected necrosis is encapsulated. Whether outcomes could be improved by earlier catheter drainage is unknown.
The researchers conducted a multicenter, randomized superiority trial involving patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis, in which we compared immediate drainage within 24 hours after randomization once infected necrosis was diagnosed with drainage that was postponed until the stage of walled-off necrosis was reached. The primary endpoint was the score on the Comprehensive Complication Index, which incorporates all complications over the course of 6 months of follow-up.
The results of the study are as follows:
· A total of 104 patients were randomly assigned to immediate drainage (55 patients) or postponed drainage (49 patients).
· The mean score on the Comprehensive Complication Index (scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more severe complications) was 57 in the immediate-drainage group and 58 in the postponed-drainage group.
· Mortality was 13% in the immediate-drainage group and 10% in the postponed-drainage group.
· The mean number of interventions (catheter drainage and necrosectomy) was 4.4 in the immediate-drainage group and 2.6 in the postponed-drainage group.
· In the postponed-drainage group, 19 patients (39%) were treated conservatively with antibiotics and did not require drainage; 17 of these patients survived.
· The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two groups.
Thus, the researchers concluded that this trial did not show the superiority of immediate drainage over postponed drainage about complications in patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis. Patients randomly assigned to the postponed-drainage strategy received fewer invasive interventions.
Reference:
Immediate versus Postponed Intervention for Infected Necrotizing Pancreatitis by Boxhoorn L et. al published in the New England journal of medicine.
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2100826
Disclaimer: This website is designed for healthcare professionals and serves solely for informational purposes.
The content provided should not be interpreted as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, prescriptions, or endorsements of specific medical practices. It is not a replacement for professional medical consultation or the expertise of a licensed healthcare provider.
Given the ever-evolving nature of medical science, we strive to keep our information accurate and up to date. However, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the content.
If you come across any inconsistencies, please reach out to us at
admin@doctornewsdaily.com.
We do not support or endorse medical opinions, treatments, or recommendations that contradict the advice of qualified healthcare professionals.
By using this website, you agree to our
Terms of Use,
Privacy Policy, and
Advertisement Policy.
For further details, please review our
Full Disclaimer.
Tags:
Recent News
Ketogenic diet may protect against stress experien...
- 03 November, 2025
STORM-PE Trial: Mechanical Thrombectomy Shows Supe...
- 03 November, 2025
AIIMS INI CET January 2026 admit cards released
- 03 November, 2025
Daily Newsletter
Get all the top stories from Blogs to keep track.
0 Comments
Post a comment
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!