November 02, 2025

Get In Touch

IL-6 Receptor Antagonists And Antiplatelet Agents Improve Survival Among Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients

Patients who are critically ill with COVID-19 infection had a 99.9% probability of improved 180-day mortality compared to placebo when treated with IL-6 receptor antagonist and a 95.0% probability of improved 180-day mortality when on antiplatelets compared to control. The trial results of the REMAP-CAP Randomized Clinical Trial were published in the journal JAMA Network.
Randomized clinical trials in critically ill patients, even those with COVID-19, typically assess only short-term outcomes like organ failure or 28-day mortality. Still, there is uncertainty regarding the longer-term effects of therapies used for the treatment of critically ill patients with COVID-19. Hence researchers conducted a secondary analysis of an ongoing adaptive platform trial (REMAP-CAP) to determine the effect of multiple interventions for critically ill adults with COVID-19 on longer-term outcomes between March 9, 2020, and June 22, 2021.

Also Read: Manual Therapy beneficial in survivors of head and neck cancer with radiation-associated trismus: JAMA
Nearly 4869 critically ill adult patients with COVID-19 with a mean age of 59.3 years (1537 [32.1%] women) were enrolled for testing interventions within multiple therapeutic domains. Patients were randomized to receive 1 or more interventions within 6 treatment domains like the immune modulators (n = 2274), convalescent plasma (n = 2011), antiplatelet therapy (n = 1557), anticoagulation (n = 1033), antivirals (n = 726), and corticosteroids (n = 401). A Bayesian outcome was survival through day 180. Bayesian piecewise exponential model was used to analyze this. Survival was measured by Hazard ratio where <1 meant improved survival (superiority) and > 1 meant worsened survival (harm). A relative improvement of less than 20% in outcome, shown by an HR greater than 0.83 represented futility.
Findings of the trial:

Among 4869 randomized patients 4107 (84.3%) had known vital status and 2590 (63.1%) were alive at day 180.
When compared with the control, IL-6 receptor antagonists had a greater than 99.9% probability of improving 6-month survival and antiplatelet agents had a 95% probability of improving 6-month survival.
Therapeutic anticoagulation, convalescent plasma, and lopinavir-ritonavir had the highest probability of trial-defined statistical futility (HR >0.83).
Hydroxychloroquine and the combination of lopinavir-ritonavir and hydroxychloroquine showed the highest probabilities of harm.
The corticosteroid domain was stopped early prior to reaching a predefined statistical trigger; there was a 57.1% to 61.6% probability of improving 6-month survival across varying hydrocortisone dosing strategies.
Also Read: Patients with AF, VTE receiving warfarin benefit from reduced aspirin use: JAMA
Thus, this prespecified secondary analysis of a bayesian adaptive randomized clinical platform trial was the largest trial that reported on the effect of treatments for COVID-19 on longer-term mortality, HRQoL, and disability in critically ill patients.
Further reading: Writing Committee for the REMAP-CAP Investigators. Long-term (180-Day) Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19 in the REMAP-CAP Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. Published online December 16, 2022. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.23257

Disclaimer: This website is designed for healthcare professionals and serves solely for informational purposes.
The content provided should not be interpreted as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, prescriptions, or endorsements of specific medical practices. It is not a replacement for professional medical consultation or the expertise of a licensed healthcare provider.
Given the ever-evolving nature of medical science, we strive to keep our information accurate and up to date. However, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the content.
If you come across any inconsistencies, please reach out to us at admin@doctornewsdaily.com.
We do not support or endorse medical opinions, treatments, or recommendations that contradict the advice of qualified healthcare professionals.
By using this website, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy.
For further details, please review our Full Disclaimer.

0 Comments

Post a comment

Please login to post a comment.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!