Hemicolectomy Not Necessary For Post Appendiceal Neuro Endocrinal Tumor Resection
- byDoctor News Daily Team
- 17 July, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 0 Mins
A new study found that hemicolectomy is unnecessary after completely resectioning an appendiceal neuroendocrinal tumor (NET) sized 1–2 cm by appendectomy as regional lymph node metastases of appendiceal NETs are clinically not relevant. The study was published in the journal The Lancet Oncology.
Oncological resections of appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of 1–2 centimeters in size are becoming increasingly common, but the rarity of these tumors has prevented clear recommendations from being made. Hence researchers conducted a cohort study to assess the malignant potential of appendiceal NETs of 1–2 cm in size in patients with or without right-sided hemicolectomy.
Also Read: Exercise-related hypoglycaemia may increase QTc interval in type 1 diabetes patients
A retrospective cohort study was carried out by pooling data from 40 hospitals in 15 European countries for patients of any age and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. Patients with histopathologically confirmed appendiceal NET of 1–2 cm size who had a complete resection of the primary tumor between Jan 1, 2000, and Dec 31, 2010, were enrolled. Patients underwent either an appendectomy only or an appendectomy with oncological right-sided hemicolectomy or ileocecal resection. The frequency of distant metastases and tumor-related mortality was the predefined primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes were the frequency of regional lymph node metastases, the association between regional lymph node metastases and histopathological risk factors, and overall survival with or without right-sided hemicolectomy. The relative all-cause mortality hazard associated with right-sided hemicolectomy when compared with appendectomy alone was estimated by Cox proportional hazards regression.
Also Read: Study finds monotonic relationship between systolic blood pressure and risk of CV outcomes in diabetes patients
Key findings of the study:
Out of the 282 patients with suspected appendiceal tumors, there were 278 with an appendiceal NET of 1–2 cm in size.
163 (59%) had an appendectomy and 115 (41%) had a right-sided hemicolectomy.
Among them 110 (40%) were men, and 168 (60%) were women with a mean age at initial surgery of 36·0 years.
Median follow-up was 13·0 years (IQR 11·0–15·6).
Appendiceal NETs were classified as a possible or probable primary tumor in two (1%) of 278 patients with distant peritoneal metastases and two (1%) 278 patients with distant metastases in the liver based on the centralized histopathological review.
All metastases were diagnosed synchronously with no tumor-related deaths during follow-up.
With the available data, it was observed that regional lymph node metastases were found in 22 (20%) of 112 patients with right-sided hemicolectomy.
Nearly 12·8% (95% CI 6·5 –21·1) of patients undergoing appendectomy were estimated to probably have residual regional lymph node metastases based on the histopathological risk factors.
There was no difference in the overall survival between patients with appendectomy and right-sided hemicolectomy (adjusted hazard ratio 0·88).
Thus, as the regional lymph node metastases of appendiceal NETs are clinically irrelevant and the present study did not show any evidence of an additional postoperative exclusion of metastases or histopathological evaluation of risk factors, right-sided hemicolectomy was not recommended After complete resection of an appendiceal NET of 1–2 cm in size.
Further reading: Nesti C, Bräutigam K, Benavent M, et al. Hemicolectomy versus appendectomy for patients with appendiceal neuroendocrine tumours 1-2 cm in size: a retrospective, Europe-wide, pooled cohort study [published online ahead of print, 2023 Jan 11]. Lancet Oncol. 2023;S1470-2045(22)00750-1. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(22)00750-1
Disclaimer: This website is designed for healthcare professionals and serves solely for informational purposes.
The content provided should not be interpreted as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, prescriptions, or endorsements of specific medical practices. It is not a replacement for professional medical consultation or the expertise of a licensed healthcare provider.
Given the ever-evolving nature of medical science, we strive to keep our information accurate and up to date. However, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the content.
If you come across any inconsistencies, please reach out to us at
admin@doctornewsdaily.com.
We do not support or endorse medical opinions, treatments, or recommendations that contradict the advice of qualified healthcare professionals.
By using this website, you agree to our
Terms of Use,
Privacy Policy, and
Advertisement Policy.
For further details, please review our
Full Disclaimer.
Recent News
DME Gujarat extends PG Ayurveda, Homeopathy round...
- 05 November, 2025
NEET counselling: CENTAC publishes round 3 provisi...
- 05 November, 2025
Marksans Pharma UK arm gets marketing nod for Exem...
- 05 November, 2025
Zydus Wellness net sales up by 31 percent in Q2 FY...
- 05 November, 2025
Daily Newsletter
Get all the top stories from Blogs to keep track.
0 Comments
Post a comment
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!