November 04, 2025

Get In Touch

Direct Percutaneous Endoscopic Jejunostomy Effective Alternative To Surgical Jejunostomy For Feeding Access

Study on Jejunostomy Tube Placements

Study on Jejunostomy Tube Placements

A recent retrospective study by John Locke and team suggests important inputs on the efficacy and safety of various methods for jejunostomy tube placements which provides enteral access for patients who are unable to meet nutritional needs orally. The findings were published in the journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.

Study Overview

The study was conducted to compare procedural success rates and complications by examining three approaches:

  • Direct percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy (DPEJ)
  • Laparoscopic (lap-J)
  • Open laparotomy (open-J)

These methods are imperative for patients who require alternative feeding routes due to their inability to consume sufficient nutrients orally.

Research Findings

The research was based on data from 201 patients which was classified into DPEJ, lap-J, and open-J cohorts, demonstrated comparable procedural success rates among the three groups (DPEJ 96.9%, Lap-J 99.1%, Open-J 100%, p=0.702). The infection and bleeding rates were also similar across the board with no reported cases of gastrointestinal perforation.

This study uncovered significant findings related to tube dysfunction within 90 days. The cases requiring complete removal and/or replacement were notably lower in the DPEJ group (0%) when compared to the surgical groups (lap-J 35.1%, open-J 40.0%, p<0.001). This discrepancy was primarily from increased incidents of tube clogging and dislodgement in the surgical approaches.

Conclusion

The findings of the study conclude that DPEJ emerges as a safe and effective alternative to surgical jejunostomy for eligible patients. DPEJ might offer a potential advantage beyond its efficacy by significantly reducing the complication rates at the critical 90-day mark. These outcomes are important for medical practitioners and patients who seek optimal enteral access solutions when considering the postoperative recovery and maintenance aspects of the jejunostomy tube placements.

Reference

Locke, J., Norwood, D., Forrister, N., Ahmed, A. M., Aryan, M., Oster, R., Reddy, S., Kabir Baig, K. K., & Peter, S. (2023). Safety and Efficacy of Direct Percutaneous Endoscopic Jejunostomy Tube Placement Compared with Surgical Jejunostomy: A Tertiary Care Analysis. In Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2023.12.013

Disclaimer: This website is designed for healthcare professionals and serves solely for informational purposes.
The content provided should not be interpreted as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, prescriptions, or endorsements of specific medical practices. It is not a replacement for professional medical consultation or the expertise of a licensed healthcare provider.
Given the ever-evolving nature of medical science, we strive to keep our information accurate and up to date. However, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the content.
If you come across any inconsistencies, please reach out to us at admin@doctornewsdaily.com.
We do not support or endorse medical opinions, treatments, or recommendations that contradict the advice of qualified healthcare professionals.
By using this website, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy.
For further details, please review our Full Disclaimer.

0 Comments

Post a comment

Please login to post a comment.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!