November 02, 2025

Get In Touch

Diabetics Who Never Used Insulin May Have Sustained Remission After Bariatric Surgery

Study on Type 2 Diabetes Remission Post-Bariatric Surgery

Study on Type 2 Diabetes Remission Post-Bariatric Surgery

There are few prospective studies with long-term follow-up evaluating the remission of type 2 diabetes (T2D) in morbidly obese patients who underwent bariatric surgery.

In a recent study, Type 2 diabetes patients who had never used insulin showed sustained remission 10 years after bariatric surgery in a prospective study of 85 patients.

Having diabetes for less than 5 years was also predictive of achieving long-term diabetes remission, Diego Moriconi, MD, of the University of Pisa (Italy) and presenting study investigator, reported at the virtual annual meeting of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes.

"Weight loss was associated with type 2 diabetes remission 1 year after surgery, but it had no impact on the long-term relapse of diabetes," Dr. Moriconi said.

If patients were taking insulin, for instance, the take-home would seem to be not to expect too much in terms of remission of their diabetes, Dr. Vilsbøll said. She added:

"Usually I am not a big fan of [relying on] diabetes duration because often we know that patients with type 2 diabetes have had diabetes for a long time before they're diagnosed." However, "it seems to be very important here."

The research team reported the findings of an observational study that had started in 2006 and recruited individuals about to undergo bariatric surgery for type 2 diabetes. Participants were evaluated before surgery and every 6-12 months after, undergoing various clinical and laboratory investigations, for 10 years.

The majority of the recruited patients (76%) were women. Most (also 76%) had undergone gastric bypass (Roux-en-Y) surgery, and the remainder had undergone sleeve gastrectomy. Both types of surgery were equally as good at getting people into remission, as defined by the American Diabetes Association Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes, Dr. Moriconi said. As such, remission was achieved if the fasting blood glucose fell below 100 mg/dL and the hemoglobin A1c below 5.7%.

Study Results

  • In the first year following surgery, 75% of patients had met diabetes remission criteria. This fell to 61% of patients after 5 years, and to 55% at 10 years.
  • At each of these time points, 25% of patients had type 2 diabetes, with 14% relapsing back at 5 years and 20% at 10 years.
  • Different characteristics were noted in 47 patients who had achieved diabetes remission at 10 years, compared with the 17 who had "relapsed" back to having type 2 diabetes and the 21 who had remained with type 2 diabetes.
  • The decrease in body mass index achieved at 10 years was no different between the three groups. However, 1 year after surgery, there had been a significantly greater drop in the body in those who achieved remission, compared with those who did not (P = .04).
  • Patients who achieved remission at 1, 5, and 10 years were more likely to have had diabetes for less than 5 years than those who remained with type 2 diabetes. The average duration of diabetes was 2 years in those achieving remission versus 8 years in those who had relapsed and 13 years in those who had remained diabetic (P < .0001).

"Glycemic control improved with time in all the three groups after bariatric surgery, although more markedly so in the remission group," Dr. Moriconi said. He highlighted how none of the patients who had achieved remission had used insulin, whereas 12% of those who had relapsed and a half (52%) of those who remained with type 2 diabetes had used insulin (P < .0001).

The findings are important, commented Tina Vilsbøll, MD, DMSc, chief consultant at the Steno Diabetes Centre Copenhagen, who chaired the session. They're important because they would help "to set the expectations for patients before they have surgery, what to expect in respect to resolution or remission of diabetes."

Source: Moriconi D. EASD 2020, Oral presentation 120.

Disclaimer: This website is designed for healthcare professionals and serves solely for informational purposes.
The content provided should not be interpreted as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, prescriptions, or endorsements of specific medical practices. It is not a replacement for professional medical consultation or the expertise of a licensed healthcare provider.
Given the ever-evolving nature of medical science, we strive to keep our information accurate and up to date. However, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the content.
If you come across any inconsistencies, please reach out to us at admin@doctornewsdaily.com.
We do not support or endorse medical opinions, treatments, or recommendations that contradict the advice of qualified healthcare professionals.
By using this website, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy.
For further details, please review our Full Disclaimer.

0 Comments

Post a comment

Please login to post a comment.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!