November 05, 2025

Get In Touch

Developmental Disability Patients Not At Higher Infection Risk After Third Molar Extractions, Suggests Study

Patients with developmental disability do not at higher rates of infections after third molar extractions, suggests study published in the Journal of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery.
Patients with developmental disabilities may exhibit behavioural problems or be unable to maintain proper hygiene, potentially placing them at greater risk for infection following the extraction of third molars. The purpose of this study was to estimate and compare the risk for surgical site infection after third molar removal between patients with and without developmental disabilities.

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent extraction of all four-third molars at Boston Children's Hospital from August 1, 2021, to July 31, 2023. Patients were excluded if all four-third molars were not present or if all four-third molars were not extracted during one visit. The primary predictor variable was developmental disability status. Subjects were grouped by developmental disability, coded as present or absent. The primary outcome variable was diagnosis of a postoperative surgical site infection. Secondary outcomes included time to follow-up and infection treatment.
RESULTS: A total of 1,896 subjects were evaluated. There were 236 subjects in the developmental disability group (72.5% male [n = 171] mean age of 19.3 ± 2.7 years) and 1,660 in the nondevelopmental disability group (53.4% female [n = 887] mean age of 19.0 ± 2.3 years). Subjects in the developmental disability group more frequently underwent their extractions in the operating room under general anesthesia (57.6% [n = 136] P < .001). The overall postoperative infection rate was 2.7% (n = 52). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of infection between the developmental disability group (0.8% [n = 2]) and the nondevelopmental disability group (3.0% [n = 50]) (P = .057). There was no significant difference in time to follow-up between subjects who were and were not diagnosed with an infection (6.26 ± 9.39 weeks vs 4.69 ± 10.95 weeks, P = .434) or for subjects in the developmental disability and nondevelopmental disability group who had an infection (2.64 ± 0.30 weeks vs 6.43 ± 9.76 weeks, P = .588). Patients with a developmental disability do not exhibit higher rates of postoperative infections following third molar extractions when compared to patients without developmental disabilities.
Reference:
Britt MC, Sepe EA, Green MA. Third Molar Extractions in Patients With Developmental Disabilities. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Aug 22:S0278-2391(24)00742-0. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2024.08.012. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 39245262.

Disclaimer: This website is designed for healthcare professionals and serves solely for informational purposes.
The content provided should not be interpreted as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, prescriptions, or endorsements of specific medical practices. It is not a replacement for professional medical consultation or the expertise of a licensed healthcare provider.
Given the ever-evolving nature of medical science, we strive to keep our information accurate and up to date. However, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the content.
If you come across any inconsistencies, please reach out to us at admin@doctornewsdaily.com.
We do not support or endorse medical opinions, treatments, or recommendations that contradict the advice of qualified healthcare professionals.
By using this website, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy.
For further details, please review our Full Disclaimer.

0 Comments

Post a comment

Please login to post a comment.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!