Combined Division Of Splenic Vein Non Inferior To Separate Division In Distal Pancreatectomy: JAMA
- byDoctor News Daily Team
- 07 July, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 0 Mins
A recent study has demonstrated that in distal pancreatectomy, the combined division of the splenic vein is non inferior compared with separate division of the splenic vein regarding safety. Thus, isolating the splenic vein from the pancreatic parenchyma is deemed unnecessary, the research team suggested.
In distal pancreatectomy (DP), the splenic vein is isolated from the pancreatic parenchyma prior to being ligated and divided to prevent intra-abdominal hemorrhage from the splenic vein stump with pancreatic fistula (PF). Conversely, dissecting the splenic vein with the pancreatic parenchyma is easy and time-saving.
With this background, researchers aimed to establish the safety of combined division of the splenic vein compared with separate division of the splenic vein.
This study was designed as a multicenter prospective randomized phase 3 trial. All results were analyzed using the modified intent-to-treat set. Patients undergoing DP for pancreatic body and tail tumors were eligible for inclusion. Patients were randomly assigned between August 10, 2016, and July 30, 2019. Patients were centrally randomized (1:1) to either separate division of the splenic vein or combined division of the splenic vein. The primary end point was the incidence of grade B/C PF, and the incidence of intra-abdominal hemorrhage was included as one of the secondary end points.
Data analysis revealed the following facts.
A total of 318 patients were randomly assigned, and 2 patients were excluded as ineligible. Of the 316 remaining patients, 150 (50.3%) were male.
The modified intent-to-treat population constituted 159 patients (50.3%) in the separate division group and 157 patients (49.7%) in the combined division group. In the modified intent-to-treat set, the proportion of grade B/C PF in the separate division group was 27.1% (42 of 155) vs 28.6% (44 of 154) in the combined division group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.108; 95% CI, 0.847-1.225; P = .047), demonstrating noninferiority of the combined division of the splenic vein against separate division.
The incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal hemorrhage in the 2 groups was identical at 1.3%."In conclusion, the multicenter COSMOS-DP trial successfully demonstrated the noninferiority of combined division of the splenic vein compared with separate division of the splenic vein in terms of the incidence of grade B/C PF. Thus, the safety of this procedure was established such that it could be recommended with more confidence."the team concluded.
For full article follow the link: doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2021.0108
Primary source:JAMA Surgery
Disclaimer: This website is designed for healthcare professionals and serves solely for informational purposes.
The content provided should not be interpreted as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, prescriptions, or endorsements of specific medical practices. It is not a replacement for professional medical consultation or the expertise of a licensed healthcare provider.
Given the ever-evolving nature of medical science, we strive to keep our information accurate and up to date. However, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the content.
If you come across any inconsistencies, please reach out to us at
admin@doctornewsdaily.com.
We do not support or endorse medical opinions, treatments, or recommendations that contradict the advice of qualified healthcare professionals.
By using this website, you agree to our
Terms of Use,
Privacy Policy, and
Advertisement Policy.
For further details, please review our
Full Disclaimer.
Tags:
Recent News
Gum disease could silently cause serious brain dam...
- 03 November, 2025
Can Early-Day Fasting Significantly Boost Metaboli...
- 03 November, 2025
Delhi HC bars doctor from running medical centre d...
- 03 November, 2025
Daily Newsletter
Get all the top stories from Blogs to keep track.
0 Comments
Post a comment
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!