Cemented Restorations Exhibit Higher Complications, Bleeding On Probing Than Screw-Retained Restorations: Study
- byDoctor News Daily Team
 - 08 July, 2025
 - 0 Comments
 - 0 Mins
 
                            
                                    Cemented restorations exhibit higher complications, and bleeding on probing than Screw-retained restorations suggests a study published in the Clinical Oral Implants Research.
A study was done to compare marginal bone levels, biological, and technical outcomes of screw-retained versus cemented all-ceramic implant-supported zirconia-based single crowns after an observation period of 7.5 years.
Forty-four single implants in the esthetic zone in 44 patients (22 females, 22 males) were randomly assigned to two types of restorations: SR (screw-retained); veneered one-piece zirconia abutment and CR (cement-retained); veneered lithium disilicate crown intraorally cemented on a one-piece zirconia abutment.
Patients were recalled annually up to 7.5 years and survival rates, biological, and technical parameters assessed. Results: A total of 31 patients attended the 7.5-year follow-up visit (17 SR group, 14 CR group). The survival rate on the restorative level was 77.5% (74.0% CR, 81.0% SR, p = .6399). Median marginal bone loss (MBL) values yielded −0.073 mm (−0.305; 0.238) in the CR and −0.215 mm (−0.500; 0.555) in the SR group (intergroup p = .6194). Mean bleeding on probing (BoP) values were significantly in favor of group SR with 20 ± 17% compared to 40 ± 22% in group CR (p = .011).
The overall biological complication rate amounted to 27.5% (42.1% CR, 14.3% SR, p = .0775), whereas the technical complication rate was 32.5% (42.1% CR, 23.8% SR, p = .314). In total, CR restorations showed significantly more complications (84.2% for CR, 38.1% for SR, p = .0041). One-piece zirconia-based single crowns on two-piece dental implants exhibited a high rate of technical and biological complications at 7.5 years of follow-up. Cemented restorations revealed significant higher rates of bleeding on probing and total complications compared to screw-retained restorations.
Reference:
Kraus, R. D., Hjerppe, J., Naenni, N., Balmer, M., Jung, R. E., & Thoma, D. S. (2024). A 7.5-year randomized controlled clinical study comparing cemented and screw-retained one-piece zirconia-based implant-supported single crowns. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 00, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14346
                                
    Disclaimer: This website is designed for healthcare professionals and serves solely for informational purposes.
    The content provided should not be interpreted as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, prescriptions, or endorsements of specific medical practices. It is not a replacement for professional medical consultation or the expertise of a licensed healthcare provider.
    Given the ever-evolving nature of medical science, we strive to keep our information accurate and up to date. However, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the content.
    If you come across any inconsistencies, please reach out to us at 
    admin@doctornewsdaily.com.
    We do not support or endorse medical opinions, treatments, or recommendations that contradict the advice of qualified healthcare professionals.
    By using this website, you agree to our 
    Terms of Use, 
    Privacy Policy, and 
    Advertisement Policy.
    For further details, please review our 
    Full Disclaimer.
Recent News
Gum disease could silently cause serious brain dam...
- 03 November, 2025
 
Can Early-Day Fasting Significantly Boost Metaboli...
- 03 November, 2025
 
Delhi HC bars doctor from running medical centre d...
- 03 November, 2025
 
Phase III data for Gazyva/Gazyvaro show significan...
- 03 November, 2025
 
Daily Newsletter
Get all the top stories from Blogs to keep track.
                    
                    
0 Comments
Post a comment
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!