November 05, 2025

Get In Touch

Bacterial Decolonization Beneficial For Acute Radiation Dermatitis

Research on Bacterial Decolonization and Radiation Dermatitis

New Research on Bacterial Decolonization and Radiation Dermatitis

New research found that bacterial decolonization is safe and more efficacious for reducing the effect of acute radiation dermatitis than the standard of care in patients undergoing treatment for cancer. The study results were published in the journal JAMA Oncology.

Radiation therapy (RT) following breast-conserving cancer surgery lowers cancer-related mortality and recurrence. However, acute radiation dermatitis (ARD) within weeks after starting radiotherapy, such as severe skin erythema, dryness, moist or dry desquamation, and/or ulceration, may interrupt radiotherapy. Literature shows that bacterial decolonization (BD) decreases the severity of acute radiation dermatitis (ARD) for patients with cancer receiving radiation therapy compared with the standard of care. Hence, researchers from Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, conducted a randomized clinical trial to determine the efficacy of bacterial decolonization (BD) on ARD severity compared with the standard of care.

Also Read: Longitudinal Changes in Breast Density may predict subsequent Breast Cancer Risk: JAMA

A phase 2/3 randomized clinical trial was conducted from June 2019 to August 2021 with investigator blinding at an urban academic cancer center by enrolling patients with breast cancer or head and neck cancer receiving radiation therapy (RT) with curative intent. Nearly 123 patients were assessed for eligibility via convenience sampling, 3 were excluded, and 40 refused to participate. Interventions included intranasal mupirocin ointment twice a day along with chlorhexidine body cleanser once daily for 5 days before RT and repeated for 5 days every 2 weeks through RT. The primary outcome was the development of grade 2 or higher ARD with moist desquamation.

Key Findings

  • About 80 patients volunteered for the trial.
  • Of 77 patients with cancer, there were 75 patients with breast cancer (97.4%) and 2 patients with head and neck cancer (2.6%) who completed RT.
  • Among these, 39 were randomly assigned BD, and 38 were randomly assigned standard of care; the mean (SD) age of the patients was 59.9 (11.9) years, and 75 (97.4%) were female. Most patients were Black or Hispanic.
  • Out of the total patients with breast and head and neck cancer, none of the 39 patients treated with BD, and about 9 of the 38 patients (23.7%) treated with standard of care developed ARD grade 2-MD or higher.
  • Similar results were seen among the 75 patients with breast cancer.
  • The mean (SD) ARD grade was significantly lower for patients treated with BD.
  • Of the 39 patients randomly assigned to BD, 27 (69.2%) reported regimen adherence, and only 1 patient (2.5%) experienced an adverse event related to BD (i.e., itch).

Thus, bacterial decolonization was found to be effective for ARD prophylaxis mainly for breast cancer patients.

Further reading: Kost Y, Deutsch A, Mieczkowska K, et al. Bacterial Decolonization for Prevention of Radiation Dermatitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial [published online ahead of print, 2023 May 4]. JAMA Oncol. 2023;10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.0444. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.0444

Disclaimer: This website is designed for healthcare professionals and serves solely for informational purposes.
The content provided should not be interpreted as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, prescriptions, or endorsements of specific medical practices. It is not a replacement for professional medical consultation or the expertise of a licensed healthcare provider.
Given the ever-evolving nature of medical science, we strive to keep our information accurate and up to date. However, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the content.
If you come across any inconsistencies, please reach out to us at admin@doctornewsdaily.com.
We do not support or endorse medical opinions, treatments, or recommendations that contradict the advice of qualified healthcare professionals.
By using this website, you agree to our Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and Advertisement Policy.
For further details, please review our Full Disclaimer.

0 Comments

Post a comment

Please login to post a comment.

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!