Asthma Increases Revision Rates Of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery In Chronic Rhinosinusitis: Study
- byDoctor News Daily Team
- 26 July, 2025
- 0 Comments
- 0 Mins
Recent research has documented that the rate of revision of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in Chronic rhinosinusitis with asthma (CRS‐A) was twice that of CRS without asthma (CRS‐alone), as published in the International Forum of Allergy and Rhinology.
Chronic rhinosinusitis with asthma (CRS‐A) has a significant impact on patient morbidity and quality of life. Nevertheless, little is known about the natural history of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in this cohort.
Therefore, Amarbir S. Gill and colleagues from the Division of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT conducted the present study to evaluate revision rates of ESS in CRS‐A and identify risk factors associated with increased likelihood for revision surgery compared to those with CRS without asthma (CRS‐alone).
The Utah Population Database was queried for patients age >18 years with CRS who underwent at least 1 ESS. Demographic information and history of ESS were collected and compared between CRS‐A and CRS‐alone using chi‐square tests for categorical variables and t tests for continuous variables. Risk factors for revision surgery were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard models.
The authors included a total of 33,090 patients (7693 CRS‐A and 25,397 CRS‐alone) were in the final analysis.
The following results were seen-
a. Mean follow up was 9.8 years in CRS‐A and 9.1 years in CRS‐alone (p< 0.001).
b. The revision rate among patients with CRS‐A (21.5%) was twice that of CRS‐alone (10.8%) (p< 0.001).
c. Among patients with CRS, a history of allergy (p< 0.001), asthma (p< 0.001), and nasal polyposis (p< 0.001) was independently associated with increased risk of revision ESS. d. Patients with CRS‐A and nasal polyposis were 6 times more likely to require revision surgery than those with CRS‐alone (p< 0.010).
Hence, the authors concluded that "the rate of revision ESS in CRS‐A was twice that of CRS‐alone; patients with CRS‐A and nasal polyposis were 6 times more likely to require revision than those with CRS‐alone."
Disclaimer: This website is designed for healthcare professionals and serves solely for informational purposes.
The content provided should not be interpreted as medical advice, diagnosis, treatment recommendations, prescriptions, or endorsements of specific medical practices. It is not a replacement for professional medical consultation or the expertise of a licensed healthcare provider.
Given the ever-evolving nature of medical science, we strive to keep our information accurate and up to date. However, we do not guarantee the completeness or accuracy of the content.
If you come across any inconsistencies, please reach out to us at
admin@doctornewsdaily.com.
We do not support or endorse medical opinions, treatments, or recommendations that contradict the advice of qualified healthcare professionals.
By using this website, you agree to our
Terms of Use,
Privacy Policy, and
Advertisement Policy.
For further details, please review our
Full Disclaimer.
Recent News
Kerala waives Rs 10 lakh discontinuation penalty f...
- 09 November, 2025
Jharkhand health dept announces SOP for ICU and CC...
- 09 November, 2025
Doctors oppose Punjab govt's decision to set up me...
- 09 November, 2025
Biocon gets 2 USFDA observations for Visakhapatnam...
- 09 November, 2025
Daily Newsletter
Get all the top stories from Blogs to keep track.
0 Comments
Post a comment
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!